Dr. Constanze Wang
Head of Government Affairs & Advocacy
+86-21-3858 5010 wang.constanze@china.ahk.deThe Third Plenary Session of the 20th of the Communist Party of China Central Committee was held in Beijing from July 15 to 18. Typically, economic reforms for the coming five to ten years are established at the Third Plenums of the Central Committee and are therefore of high importance. The documents released afterwards are meant to point out a long-term direction. That this Plenum took place later than usual could be a sign that this long-term direction might be highly controversial within the highest ranks.
This time, the high-level documents, the Communique and the Resolution on Deepening Reform, represent – even stronger than expected – a continuation and reinforcement of existing policy directions. Even though China’s (current) economic development seems to be a major point of discussion this time during the session (and hence a major concern of the leadership), the documents lack more immediate policy twists targeting the stimulation of the economy, especially on the demand-side. Rather, the policy directions and measures are much more a manifestation of the long-term structural priorities set before:
As expected, technological and high-quality development take a prominent position in documents. This long-term direction has been strongly (re-)emphasized in the Two Sessions, and the Plenum clearly manifests this endeavor. The leadership continues its course towards industrial transformation and technological progress, which is seen as a means to fulfill several other key necessities, such as economic growth and national security. The major points are:
What it means for Foreign Companies
Chinese technological pursuit and industrial transformation offers many opportunities for companies offering high-quality products and solutions. As Chinese competitors gradually increase their investment in R&D, however, the competitive pressure on foreign companies in the market will also increase in the high-end segments. Also, from a national security and self-reliance perspective, foreign companies might still have a hard time winning public tenders or securing their customer base.
Given the current economic situation, there was the hope that the Plenum would push for stimulus measures for boosting consumption. However, this is remarkably absent from the documents, but some initiatives can be related:
What is means for Foreign Companies
If the Chinese government will be able to reinstall consumer confidence and boost consumption is a major concern of foreign companies. The documents, however, do not propose more reform policies on stimulating consumption in the near term. They rather point to more long-term structural adaptations. These would be indeed helpful, but still very slow and challenging to implement. When consumption can be visibly boosted again is therefore still uncertain.
Already at the very beginning the resolution addresses the improvement of the business environment and puts a strong focus on the private sector:
What is means for foreign companies
Economic development cannot be promoted without the private sector. The recent focus on the private sector (simultaneously with the state sector) will see a continuation. Since private sector in China does not mean automatically foreign companies (as a this is a different ownership category), effects for foreign investments might be limited. On the one hand, however, the focus on fairness might have implications for an improvement of the business environment in general. On the other hand, private companies might more likely and more quickly emerge as competitors.
Just one of the 60 articles in the resolution focuses on foreign investment, and here also no new reform measures in sight but the usual emphasis on:
What is means for Foreign Companies
For foreign companies, this is a clear manifestation of the previous direction for foreign investment. No major deviations are to be expected in the coming 5 or 10 years or even in a longer time frame. Even though we will see further tangible policy steps in all these areas, independent technologies and innovation (or self-sufficiency) will be (even higher) on the agenda. Nevertheless, companies need to take this renewed confirmation of the long-term trends as another opportunity to carefully scrutinize what that means for them and continuously watch out for implementation policies.
Head of Government Affairs & Advocacy
+86-21-3858 5010 wang.constanze@china.ahk.de